« Social media monitoring? Think of the web as one big file cabinet.
Searching for “Mark Goren” »

A single social media monitoring platform just isn’t enough

18 November 2009, 12:14 am

I’ll probably hear some good natured opposition to this post from some friends at different Social Media Monitoring companies, but I stand solidly behind this advice.

No matter which social media monitoring platform you’re committed to, use others as well.

True insight comes from using several different kinds of search engines, applications and tools. That’s not a knock on the different services, it’s reflective of the monitoring environment’s reality. By using several of the different services available – mostly for no added cost – you’ll uncover deeper intelligence, greater statistics and a better understanding of the conversation.

There may be any number of reasons for this logic, whether you’re committed to paid or free tools:

• Every algorithm is different. While one tool may be capturing certain conversations quickly, another tool may be filling in the blanks in a more timely way. By cross checking different engines, you’ll be able to catch more results sooner.

• Even if you’re using a robust, feature-rich service, there are likely many different insights that the service doesn’t incorporate. Take Twitter, for example. You’re collecting tweets, but are able to drill down about the user, who the person is connected to, since when they’ve been on Twitter, frequency of Tweets, which links they’ve posted, what pictures they’ve linked to, and so on and so on and so on? The more tools you use, and some offer very specific functionalities, the greater you’ll come to understand a particular conversation.

• Backup your main monitoring service with others, just in case. In case your system is going offline for maintenance. In case results turn up missing. In case you don’t have access to a wifi network. For example, through you may be using a web based service, you may want to download mobile applications – Tweetie and Say What? come to mind – to check in while you’re away from your computer.

• Sentiment analysis. Different services go about providing this analysis in different ways. Some automate the process, relying on different “trigger” words to reach a conclusion, others assign sentiment through human analysis, while still others leave it all up to you. As a result, if you like so many of the features offered by the platform you’re committed to, but don’t “trust” how it handles sentiment, you may want to go in a different direction to gain an accurate measure.

• Unless your platform allows you to add custom RSS sources, which helps ensure that you’re not missing any results, you’ll have to find different ways to keep track of these other results.

These are just some of what could be a very long list. And in no way is this post meant to diminish the importance of finding your comfort zone with a primary platform and sticking to it. That said, a single social media monitoring platform just isn’t enough if you really want to get more out of your monitoring program.

So, I ask you, what combination of sites, tools and applications are you using? Need ideas, here’s an exhaustive directory of social media monitoring tools that will show you the potential of what’s out there.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses
  • Joseph Fiore

    Mark,

    This is an insightful post and anyone reading it should observe its words of wisdom. Ironically, one of my latest blog posts discusses how advancements in SMM may have gotten a little ahead of themselves - the idiom “getting the carriage before the horse” speaks particularly well to issues with depth of sourcing.

    One thing I always ask potential clients is what tools they are using. I recall the conversation of one prospect (now a client) when they first contacted us, and she threw out a whopping 31 tools. This wasn’t surprising to me given the breadth of their monitoring scope. What was surprising was how much she was still missing.

    While there is reason to celebrate the opening of wall-gardens like Facebook, there are sources such as message boards, forums and chatrooms which present their own set of tracking issues. Comment tracking is another important piece, and very few people realize that this isn’t a given with even some of the most elaborate paid monitoring and listening systems.

    If we look through the topic of comment tracking with a fine toothed comb, each source type present its own set of challenges. Message board topics and discussions are in a threaded form and aside from the fact that many require login access to view, the permalink convention isn’t a given. Similarly, not all comments on blogs, video and image sources have permalinks either (this is an anchor tag which takes you directly to the comment in the posted incident) making them just as challenging as tracking a message board thread. The trickiest of which being the need to track changes on Websites of interest. If you factor in that RSS syndication and site search function hasn’t become as widespread as we would like, you can start to realize just how difficult it is to use an exhaustive approach to sourcing mentions and relevant content.

    We managed to develop our own comment tracking platform (tra.cktion) some time ago, and this really helped us address some of the abovemention gaps in our content discovery efforts. And if there is one helpful nugget of advice I can offer your readers - make sure you don’t exclude YouTube from the mix.

    Being the second largest search property, many people may be aware of how to make a handy RSS-able search for YouTube (and if you aren’t familiar with this method, may I suggest reviewing an old “tips” post I wrote on the topic), but many aren’t aware that YouTube comments aren’t picked up using this method.

    Not to worry! I have the perfect solution for the monitoring mavens in attendance - here is the link to a relatively unknown and important search feature provided by YouTube to search comments.

    Joseph
    @RepuTrack

  • Mark Goren | Transmission Content + Creative

    Thanks for this elaborate and well put together comment, Joseph. Excellent points about comment tracking, walled gardens and YouTube tracking.

    Think I’ll have to put this up as a guest post!

  • Kelly Rusk

    Hi Mark,

    I definitely agree with you, as I do the monitoring for my company and I use a variety of tools (including our own SMM service–part of our larger traditional media monitoring and analysis). I’ve also tested most of the big players and while I think each is good for different purposes, none tell the whole picture.

    Particularly with Twitter, there are so many great (free!) tools available, but it’s also important from a consistency perspective. For example on my personal blog, I track analytics in three different places and often get three different sets of numbers. I have no idea why, but I do know I’m not fooling myself by only trusting one source.

    Cheers,
    Kelly

  • Mark Goren | Transmission Content + Creative

    Twitter is exactly where I’m coming from, Kelly. There are so many ways to add insight to tweets, it really may be too much for some businesses to handle directly.

    Thanks for stopping by, Kelly!

  • Leave a Reply




     
    Is social media a fad? Check out this great video by Socialnomics, I think you'll see that the question is well answered.